Archive for the ‘Astronomy & Space’ Category

How exactly does the theory that something can come out of nothing show evidence that no creator was needed?


One of the leading theories is basically that it IS possible for something to come out of nothing. In the world of subatomic particles, it’s possible for a matter/antimatter pair (say, a proton and an antiproton) to form spontaneously out of nothing. If this happened on a very large scale you could get a whole universe — (in theory). Some use this argue for a creator, or against a creator. For those who use this evidence that we don’t need a creator: this theory accounts for “something” to be created from nothing, but this does nothing to explain the enviornment that these subatomic particles had to come out of nothing right? Where did the enviorment come from that allowed this to happen?
Choosing a best answer is going to be tough. Many of you gave great answers. Some of you are simply stupid.

The first two answers in particular. As for Fred, go back to the drawing board youself. It is your type in fact that pollute the sites such as this. There are many non-believers in a creator that believe the something out of nothing theory, it’s a leading viewpoint in science right now, ask any biologist who is up to speed with the trends you moron.

As for the second poster. You allude to an infinite past which has been shown to be impossible. Infinity is a concept, not a reality. You can’t have an “actual” infinite because think about it, if you have “INFINITY” you can’t add or subtract from it.

Anyone else who rambled, do more research before shooting off, it makes you look like a fool to anyone here over 14.