EVOLUTIONISTS. can you answer me these questions? or at least 1 or 2 of them logically?
Posted by admin | Filed under Religion & Spirituality
TRY TO AT LEAST ANSWER ONE.. I KNOW SOME OF THEM ARE TOO LONG & THAT THERE’S A LOT OF THEM.
1. Where did the space for the universe come from?
2. Where did matter come from?
3. Where did the laws of the universe come from (inertia, etc)
4. How did matter get so perfectly organized?
5. Where did the energy come from to do all the organizing?
6. When, where, why, and how did life come from dead matter?
7. When, where, why and how did life lean to produce itself?
8. With what did the 1st cell capable of sexual reproduction reproduce?
9. Why would any plant or animal want to reproduce more of it’s kind since this would only make more mouths to feed & decrease the chances of survival? (Does the individual have a drive to survive, or the species? How do you explain this?)
10. How can mutations (recombining of the genetic code) create any new, improved varieties? (Recombining English letters will never produce Chinese books.)
11. Is it possible that similarities in design between different animals prove a common Creator instead of a common ancestor?
12. Natural selection only works with the genetic information available and tends only to keep a species stable. How would you explain the increasing complexity in the genetic code that must have occurred if evolution were true?
13. When, where, why and how did:
a) Single-celled plants become multi-celled.
(where are the two – and three- celled intermediates?)
b) Single-celled animals evolve?
c) Fish change to amphibians?
d) Amphibians to reptiles?
e) Reptiles change to birds? (The lungs, bones, eyes, reproductive organs, heart, method of locomotion, body covering, etc., are all very different!) How did the intermediate forms live?
14. When, where, why, how and from what did:
a) Whales evolve?
b)Sea horses evolve?
c) Bats evolve?
d) Eyes evolve?
e) Ears evolve?
f) Hair, skin, feathers, scales, nails, claws, etc., evolve?
15. Which evolved first (how, and how long did it work without the others)?
a) the digestive system, the food to be digested, the appetite, the ability to find and eat the food, the digestive juices, or the body’s resistance to it’s own digestive juice (stomach, intestines, etc.)?
b) The drive to reproduces or the ability to reproduce?
c) The lungs, the mucus lining to protect them, the throat, or the perfect mixture of gases to be breathed into the lungs?
d) DNA or RNA to carry the DNA message to cell parts?
e) The termite or the flagella in it’s intestines that actually digest the cellulose?
f) the plants or the insects that live on and pollinate the plants?
g) The bones, ligaments, tendons, blood supply, or muscles to move the bones?
h) The nervous system, repair system, or hormone system?
i) The immune system ofr the need for it?
God lives outside of time.
He is eternal.
January 30th, 2010 at 8:34 am
It’s all here:
February 1st, 2010 at 5:45 am
Dammit, I’m not a scientist.
But to answer ALL of your questions collectively, if you actually went through high school science courses, YOU WOULD KNOW.
February 3rd, 2010 at 7:28 am
Where did God come from?
Injecting a supernatural explanation accomplishes absolutely nothing and adds not at all to our understanding of the universe.
February 6th, 2010 at 11:10 am
Dewin told his daughter before he died. That evolution was impossible.
February 9th, 2010 at 6:58 pm
4 = sentient puddle fallacy
February 10th, 2010 at 2:56 am
All of those questions have been answered by science. Get off of answersingenesis and learn some real science.
February 11th, 2010 at 7:02 pm
Did you study any science at school? One lesson on biology? Just one?
February 13th, 2010 at 1:47 am
What is this, physics/biology/everything exam? F*** off, I’ve got real exams to study for.
February 13th, 2010 at 2:17 am
Look, it’s a Gish Gallop!
Posting a science question in the religion and spirituality section often means the asker does not really want an answer. His goal is to ask a question that he believes proves some scientific knowledge to be wrong, or that science does not yet answer, and make the implicit claim that the only other explanation is a god, and specifically, the same god he happens to believe in.
It’s the “god of the gaps” – intellectually bankrupt, since it favors ignorance instead of knowledge, and because of the contained logical fallacy – and it’s done almost exclusively by christians.
February 16th, 2010 at 9:25 am
OK, I’m going to choose one to show how ridiculous they are.
4. How did matter get so perfectly organized?
Answer – It isn’t.
February 18th, 2010 at 9:38 am
Too lazy to google it?
This information is at your fingertips. The only motivation for asking it here is to create a situation in which you can argue it with neophytes.
Which means you don’t really want to know.
February 20th, 2010 at 2:27 pm
Evolution does not attempt to explain how the universe came to exist. Why are most creationists so confused about that?
February 20th, 2010 at 9:51 pm
Evolution has nothing to do with cosmology!
Questions 1-5 are cosmological.
I am a Christian I have no issue with science and God. I believe God set all physical laws in motion. The Big Bang was postulated by a Catholic Monk.
I suggest this site from Berkeley for a easy to understand answer to all the other questions.
February 21st, 2010 at 4:33 am
1. space is just the nothingness, it doesn’t have to come from anywhere.
2. Matter can’t be created nor destroyed
3. They didn’t come from anywhere, it’s just an observation of how things work in the universe
4. it’s not
5. energy can’t be created nor destroyed
6. there’s a theory about amino acids and a chemical reaction that took place on earth in the ocean.
7. The main basics of life is to replicate otherwise it isn’t exactly life.
8. It wasn’t a single cell, and it replicated it’s self with a possibility of different genes.
9. Because species want to keep living on
10. mutations don’t always work out for the best, there are a few cases of deformities which hinder the animal form surviving.
11. It leans more to the suggestion of a common ancestor
12. Going back to mutations (don’t act like this happened all over night)
13. Sponges are the first mile stone to Multi-cellar creatures
14. whales are mammals and they originated from a dog like ancestor (or maybe that’s just dolphins), for the rest you need to look at a milestone chart to understand that
15. The first trait of life most likely was to replicate DNA and RNA
February 24th, 2010 at 4:57 am
They won’t answer your question because THEY DON’T KNOW. Evolutionists weren’t provided with those answers by their pseudoscientific “gods” yet they keep their faith in idiotic nonsense.
February 25th, 2010 at 11:39 am
1. I don’t know.
2. I don’t know.
3. They just are, just like your measly god.
4. Through the laws of physics.
5. Weak understanding of science.
6. Abiogenesis/ we don’t truly know for sure.
7. As soon as life was formed.
8. Look at meiosis.
9. Your f*cking retarded.
10. Go research what DNA is dumb*ss.
11. Common ancestor. Why conclude that it’s supernatural if it can be explained naturally?
12. The more complex species survive with more success. Yet again weak understanding of science.
13. Research evolution.
14. Research evolution.
15. Research evolution; it’s all explained in science if you really are that currious, but it seems to me that you are just trying to fight against it.
Also, if you think that I don’t know isn’t a good enough answer, what makes your answer true? Just because you ask questions that we can’t answer doesn’t make you right. Also, most of your questions aren’t even on the subject of evolution.
Go back to school and research all of this if you really want to know, and don’t just say “that’s not possible.” If you have that attitude, you won’t understand sh*t.
February 28th, 2010 at 12:46 am
You require a series of questions to try to disprove evolution.
Ask yourself, then: How can you be sure that there is God?
Let me explain a bit myself:
→ Before the Big Bang or the creation of “space” or “universe”, there existed a source of huge energy. This energy was compressed until it had to break out. It led to a series of collision called the “Big Bang”.
As for evolution of creatures and how our bodies are so perfect, it took MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF YEARS to achieve this perfection. It was caused through generic mutations, and each creature before it had something better about it.
The sexual reproduction of cells was caused when Earth was created with various gas from the Big Bang, the most basic cells came together and created a tiny, tiny organism. This organism eventually grew.
^ A helpful site.
Also, think about this.
Evolution is science and “nature” correct?
If God could defy evolution (“nature”), why can’t he defy all the bad things in the world, like disabilities, deaths, pain, depression, drugs, etc. etc.? Why isn’t the world perfect? God is portrayed as a loving figure, so if he was so loving to humans, why didn’t he create a flawless world full of happiness? Hmm ?
February 28th, 2010 at 11:29 am
perhaps you should go to school and take some science classes, if you really want to understand the answers. They are fare more complex than your silly “magic pixies did it” ending
March 1st, 2010 at 2:30 pm
hey you should probably ask this question in the science section being atheist does no mean your a scientist oh and the first six have nothing to do with evolution
March 3rd, 2010 at 11:21 pm
8. With others like themselves. This is possible because many simple single celled life forms can reproduce both asexually and sexually.
9. Things reproduce, not so much because they want to as because it is simply how they work. Evolution continuously eliminates lines that do not work that way. So only those that do are still around.
10. Lots of mutations simply duplicate or accumulate DNA code. This in itself does not necessarily add anything useful, except as a raw material that is free to mutate without being as likely to kill the individual (since it is extra DNA not essential DNA. But those subsequent mutations can produce new and useful results that can be rewarded with increased reproductive success, spreading this “new information” through the species or producing new species. Random generic noise that is sorted by reproductive success becomes information.
12. See 10.
–
Regards,
John Popelish
P.S. asking each of these, individually, in the biological science section will get you really informative answers, if you are willing to risk learning.
March 7th, 2010 at 10:17 am
1. We don’t have a good understanding of it, but it was from a natural beginning. No deity needed.
2. The energy from the Big Bang.
3. See answer to #1.
4. Most likely the electromagnetic force and gravity.
5. From the Big bang, gravity and dark energy.
6. See answer to #1.
7. See answer to #1.
8. Probably a female counterpart to itself.
9. To move into new, unexploited niches.
10. Combining different amounts of four different elements will make new kinds of polymers, organic or not.
11. Argument from design is a logical fallacy. It begs the question of “Who designed to designer.”
12. Again, argument from complexity is a logical fallacy. There are simple, multicellular animals which carry more genetic material then us.
13, 14 & 15: See answer to #1.
March 10th, 2010 at 6:44 pm
Surrendering ignorance to God is never a good idea. Inform yourself.
March 13th, 2010 at 1:21 am
I’m not a genius in astronomy. I’m REALLY better at biology, but I’ve answered 12 of them.
1) The Universe has no hard boundaries. Space has no boundaries, and creates itself. Since matter (and the interstellar/intergallactic plasma) is expanding, the Universe gets wider. Before it was smaller because everything was at the same place.
2) We do not know where did matter come from. As space is, by convention, “that thing on which matter moves”, we assume it existed prior to space. The energy and matter of the Big Bang were concentrated in a single thing, probably different from matter. We believe they got different as the whole thing rearranged.
3) We assume they were there from the start of the thing, because they operate quite consistently and there is no evidence of them being different before, except in the moment in which the singularity was produced.
4) Electromagnetism, nuclear forces, and gravity are quite neat.
5) Stuff (even energy) transforms, so it was there from the start.
6) Abiogenesis is distinct to evolution. We do not know how things that were not alive came to be, just that it happened. We have some nice theories, about high concentrations of organic chemicals (they generate abiotically) an atmosphere that caused reduction instead of oxidation, electrical storms and moderate-to high temperatures.
We’ve been so far as to create proteine. Given enough million years of experiment, who knows?
7) Life did not “learn”. We define life as something that already has the means of reproducing itself. It’s the abiogenesis part the only one who hasn’t come to definitive conclusions.
She cloned herself (it’s called asexual reproduction). Mutation and gene-sharing (bacteriae share genes with each other) could do the rest. Plus, multiple different cells could have surfaced. There is no proof for a single cell.
9) The will to reproduce is heavily selected. Animals without that drive die without descendants, and so the ones with a reproducing drive prevail.
10) A random mutation can turn some “rubbish DNA” into useful proteines, as an example. Given enough years and selecting pressure…
11) Similarities in design…. The function does not create the organ, but heavily selects for it (i.e. If you want to fly, you better have wings). Plus, species have common ancestors with the others.
12) Migration and diversity of ecological niche can put some heavy pressure on weird and unusual traits. UNDER THE SAME CONDITIONS, Natural Selection keeps a species stable (only perhaps faster, or more resilient, as that is favorably selected upon)
Different situations force changes.
13) I’d have to check heaps of biology books to answer that, but they are available for consultation. I’d advise you go for it.
March 15th, 2010 at 6:02 pm
There are numerous answers posted on the web answering Walt Brown’s questions (his questions, not yours) but I get the feeling that posting them would be a waste if time since you probably won’t read them.
By the way, the first 5 questions don’t have anything to do with evolution. Read the rest of the questions carefully. Many are based on preconceptions that he isn’t bothering to validate, but expects people to answer questions based on those preconceptions.
March 18th, 2010 at 2:15 am
Wow..don’t expect them to answer you with logic…they will only turn back to their fossils and suggestions of how we all got here and insist that an explosion created this order. The god of this world has blinded their eyes and understanding so that they don’t come to the knowledge of christ. You just gotta keep telling them and pray that God do the rest.
March 18th, 2010 at 3:32 am
Evolutionists have done to science, what hypocrites have done to religion.
March 18th, 2010 at 6:47 pm
Yes, yes, yes. Thank you. The Law of Biogenesis. Gives evolutionists nightmares. Love you for this.
I’ve been proposing this for several weeks now:
Evolution is a religion. It has no choice but to be. It’s a theory that by its very nature must be taken on faith. According to the evolutionary Atheist, mankind’s brain has evolved. That statement alone parks the theory of evolution directly into the realms of circular reasoning. Any argument to check the validity of an argument is itself an argument that might be wrong. Evolution is theory by which one uses one’s brain to test the validity of one’s brain, without ever being able to prove one’s brain is “right” to begin with.
One cannot use an unknown measurement to measure another unknown measurement. All his conclusions could be wrong, he’d never know it. The very method by which he measures could be wrong, he’d never know it. The only way to give himself the illusion of escape therefore, is to have faith in the idea his assumptions about the first measurement are right to begin with. He is still trapped by the great uncertainty however. (And saying no one can know anything for certain, is itself a claim of certainty.)
The only way to find out whether one is in a box, is to first stand outside it. The only way to test for evolution therefore, is to be completely outside its processes.
Logical scientific statement: I do not know whether mankind’s brain has evolved.
Circular scientific statement: Starting with my mind, I will now use my mind in order to test whether my mind has evolved.
Logical scientific conclusion: The only way to test for any evidence of evolution is to be completely outside the processes of evolution. Evolution then, if it can even be accepted at this point, must be accepted by faith.
Circular scientific conclusion: All my observations and conclusions could be wrong, I’d never know. But since I hold a childish, hissy-fit grudge against God, I’ll go ahead and claim I’m right anyway.